RE:Re Re Re iiioiiiThat was alot of words to say very little. Once again, the fact that Jonathan Ritchey would not be sitting on the Board of Directors was spelled out at several points well in advance in the May 8th AGM information circular (that little bit of mail you got which included instructions on how to submit your shareholder votes). It's a critical document and, while dry, I challenge anyone to try to make it through them every time one comes across their mailbox for just that kind of information. You're certainly free to be disappointed, but I'm not phased. Being very good at something doesn't make somebody good at all things. Moreover, the board is very strong in terms of industry insight and I'm happy with Exro's strategic direction.
I'm not going to get further into HRH with you on this board except to say that the patent is supposedly secure in the EU and the US according to HRH's own NR so there is no need to be nonspecific about how it operates. 'Just trust us' isn't an appropriate description of a technology being brought to market. Should I ever be so inclined, I'd be happy to discuss the merits of HRH's further developments on the appropriate board (which I currently troll by the way - and the content of which should at least give you some pause, but I digress).
You're welcome to your moonshot. While I haven't been around as long as many, I've already seen more than a few retail investors become bagholders because they were caught up in a narrative that turned out to lack real substance. I've had real success following Buffett's first two rules. Rule #1 is don't lose money. Rule #2 is don't forget Rule #1. I would rather miss an opportunity because it just didn't have solid fundamentals behind it (I'm talking to you PYR) than go into a stock half-cocked and blinded by optimism ready to be served up to the gods of chance. I'm an investor; I dont play darts.