RE:RE:Galaxy Resources - James Bay Project
No question about the high quality nature of our project Blaggers. My issue is with WSP characterisation in the statement made, clearly disparaging to us.
"Nemaska is a high quality project",
"Galaxy is a high grade project with very good potential"
"Rose is a low grade deposit" ? Why not say it's a high quality project like they did with Nemaska. Clearly the intent is to imply our project is not as good as the others, and to do this to the body responsible for permitting our project.
Working most of my career in a software engineering consulting firm, if you had two clients deemed competitors, and you where on one project, you never talked to one client about the other project or make public statements about the projects especially in any kind of dispariging way or you got fired, period!
WSP should be embarassed as it reflects very poorly on them as a firm because ultimately "They are the ones responsible for the content of that document Galaxy submitted", even if this statement was inserted by Galaxy for there own purpose!
I'm glad you brought this up with management, if I were JSL I'd be in touch with WSP's management and tear strip off them. This permitting process is challenging enough as it is without this kind of stuff, we are paying huge amounts of money to them to be leading us through this process.
cheers
b-low-s-high