RE:any thoughts on the .015 for the past two days My suspicion is market manipulation. Put these lines together:
1. There is no doubt that Haywood is representing a single trader and so far sold almost >33M shares since mid April. If not a naked short it represent either debenture holders or William Simpson.
2. Repeatedly the sell activity of insiders are missing on SEDI. Even when was asked in our petition and later by emails, recieved no answer.
3. It was claimed each house represents many traders and we that put question on this are fools. Simply ignoring recent activities of Haywood by hiding beind generalization.
4. The management claim there is no manipulation. The article I shared gave a very different perspective and hard to accept insiders in cannabis sector not being aware of it. The DD required them to be more considerate to our request. Do not forget what was claimed on the corporation Deck:
"No one party owns more than 5% of outstanding shares"
The hidden message is that Canaccord (the debenture holder) has sold almost all the ~250M shares has obtained since september 2019 till the AGM. And we know the big seller: "anonymous"
5. put #4 beside #3 to test the honesty of the person with those claims.
6. How Canaccord can sell the shares which are obtained @6 cents each? Simply the answer is probabely in the Globe article I shared earlier: Probabely somehow they have shorted earlier so nothing to loose.
7. Canaccord trader that we have to accept is not representing Canaccord itself is abusing the unfair access to the market places for the arbitrage. For example today "anonymous trader" obtained 410,000 shares at 1.5 cent at Aeq. Neo. which immediately was listed in the second level quotes to sell for 2 cents. Yesterday or the day earlier Canaccord tradr did exactly the same.
8. Friendly regulations toward banks: You have no voice to ask your bank to place your order in specific market place. It will get routed. Did any of your trades executed in a market other than Aeq. Lit or CSE? Mine never. But juct check how other ATS market is used with few houses to obtain premium shares? Why when My bank can sell shares to me at ATS and CSE as its customer, giving out the shares to Canaccord and anonymous in other market places? the answer is just random you were routed. But how long it can be continued if random? It is a frequently repeated observation over the last year and not a prove but a wise man said:
"The hunter who always comes home with meat is a thief"
Even if all could be a legal manipulation the silence of the management is not justified. Do not forget our petition request: "we ask the board to submit an official request of immediate investigation to IIROC and OSC." that not only got ignored but also we were insulted for asking for such an investigation and a simple Q/A session that any normal company holds.
9. All the (most probabely paid) negative influencers and possible ties with few individuals, previously in contract with GLH were reported to the management. Their answer was exactly this:
"There is nothing we can do. Once we stopped being a client, he went negative. He has not once talked to the company since then to form his opinions. There is no value for us to engage ..."
Yet they can go full force to threaten and insult their investors for asking a long overdue Q/A.
On May 27 I asked: " ...is any chance to have time for Q/A in the next meeting?" and the answer was simple: "We are not planning on Q & A at this time."
Without this answer there might not be such a petition and I do believe without the petition we did not have the Q/A segment. Yet non of the majority non-registered share holders were allowed to ask questions and none of mine answered through emails. Such a simple fact was twisted by few including ... to discredit the petitioners.
"Where were all the shareholders you represent ... GLH has over 30,000 shareholders. Yet not even 100 signed your petition….. so that is 0.003% of our shareholders to put things in perspective. "
This is while they never answered (multiple emails) what percentage of the shareholders are registered and he was told earlier that I alone own ~0.3% shares. I know others like me as well.
Such a twist weight at the possible dishonesty.
10. This is not all the story but time is not appropriate for all.
All in all I insist on our request: "we ask the board to submit an official request of immediate investigation to IIROC and OSC." Not needed to say some of us including me have not left it behind, yet without an official request hard to gain any thing. IIROC annual penalty totals to less than 1/1,000,000 of the Canadian market value. A complete joke.
Please be supportive if you agree.