RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:fcu vs isoCLOWN LIAR BASHER TROLL SCUMBAG PAID NEXGEN EMPLOYEE
You have been posting for years on the fission board. You obviously HATE Randhawa and you continue here under many many I.D.'s as a personal vendetta. Kind of the same as the Oversight group in 2015.
SUPERVISOR wrote: I have a challenge for you gizard16 if I was a paid basher it means that I am disingenuous which means at the least I would most likely be stretching the truth and therefore unlikely to maintain consistency with what I post within a very tight range of whatever argument or contention or idea that I have ever posted on this website or anywhere else for that matter. My challenge for you gizard16 is to demonstrate to everyone here where I have been inconsistent because surely if I was making stuff up for the agenda of "bashing" FCU there would be plenty of times I would be less than consistent with the stuff that I post.
One of the amusing things about this FCU forum on this website is that all the pro FCU posters seem to have very little to say about FCU per se. Why don't you talk up stuff that is very specific to FCU that makes it such a great investment and see if it passes the "Pub Test" and if you really believe in what you think then you wouldn't be afraid of a chat forum "Pub Test".
Let me get you started.... the deposit is shallow hahaha my resonse... it wouldn't matter if mineralisation started at surface because the offftake agreement has completelly ruined FCU as an investible investment unless you are CGN and CGN is now likely to do what smart people do which is make the most of their situation by moving forward in a way where the get the most out of their initial investment in FCU at the lowest price possible moving forward which is exactly what appears to be playing out (The Thesis).
gizard16 wrote: What a CLOWN. You do a very good job of getting yourself booted off SH for continuous bashing. What are you on now, your 10th I.D. since you've been posting? Once a LOSER always a LOSER. Pretty pathetic when Nexgen has to pay to bash a rival.
SUPERVISOR wrote: Here is a joke - you try and run someone off a platform because you don't like what they are saying when they have an option of going to another platform with an even bigger audience which they were not on.
Now on the larger platform the people that wanted that person off the original platform have absolutely no influence on what can be said by the person that they prefer not to have a voice.
Outcome - very bad management of a situation.
Have a good weekend everyone - next week could be interesting.