RE:RE:Treaty Creek is still wide openhighper wrote: another potential area of interest at treaty creek is indicated by the indications of the beginnings of a large MT anomaly at the far right hand corner of this map. It lies far beyond the one designated as GS2 which is closer to the orpiment zone. it probably lies near where the tunnel route runs near the block of seabridge claims ensconed within the treaty creek claim group.
It is designated as artifact on the MT map teuton received from seabridge. Do you honestly believe seabridge did not extend its survey all the way to their proposed mill site. Meaning sea knows what lies beyond the edge of this map. It might not have been in their interest to tell teuton and amk much about this anomaly..
what we see is the edge of an MT anomaly that extends about 750 meters deep on its extreme edge... It obviously could extend much deeper to the east.... It is so close to easy access to the treaty creek valley that it would reduce the capex costs considerably if it proved to be of any value at all.
https://teuton.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/treatyanomalyAfigure.pdf
This MT anomaly was designated as an artifact because station 223 did not provide any readings and station 224 by itself was not considered adequate to confirm the data.
That said, it seems clear that the large confirmed anomaly under Orpiment appears to reach toward the surface in three locations like a large "W" shape. Up toward Goldstorm, up toward Orpiment, and up toward the eastern edge of the Treaty Creek property. Station 224 is still within the Treaty Creek boundary, not yet into the Seabridge claims, so there will be potential out there for further exploration. It's hard to believe that there would be a Goldstorm discovery, and possibly an Orpiment discovery, without a third discovery another 3 km to the east around stations 222 - 224. It does not appear that we've seen the outer edges of the Sulphurets Thrust System yet on any IP or MT results I've reviewed.
Do your own due diligence. GLTA. Doug