RE:Vulnerability to a lowball offer is greatly reduced highper, to be clear, I'm not complaining about Management. I first got into the stock after Teuton & Minvita had that first big hit on the Clone property and we were hoping to be the next Eskay Creek. (Anyone remember Murry Pezim?!!) That was before the turn-of-the-century! LOL! I'm still here, so I sincerely appreciate what Dino has done throughout all the cycles in the interim.
I don't agree with everything managment has done, but the ability to retain prospective properties over decades is surely admirable. The wisdom to install non-buyout NSRs on almost all farm-out contracts could be a massive benefit in such a large deposit region, Treaty Creek is the most obvious example. Furthermore, Mangement has not lined their pockets with rent, consulting, and other payments that burn through shareholder funds. Kudos to Dino for keeping share dilution to a minimum.
The armchair quarterbacking is just throwing out ideas to try and get the market to recognize the value the Treaty Creek NSR and the value of all the other properties. Just looking for opinions, of which yours is noted.
Cheers, it's all good! (Unless your short, lol!)