RE:RE:RE:RE:1 contrato s.v.p. QREWPT---I would like to show you (without bashing you) where your market cap argument is flawed. To say that a possible billion dollar contract or portion of has already been priced in is ludicrous--this is not Amazon, Apple or Merck (or how about NVAX with a 9.9 billion market cap with NO product on the market at this time) where in each case a half a billion or billion dollar contract is a DROP in the bucket for these companies.
I saw an interview the other night on CNBC with the CEO of Workhorse who's stock is almost 3 times the market cap of PYR. When asked about possibly being awarded the government contract for new US postal service trucks, the CFO's reply was that even a portion of a contract worth billions of dollars would be "transformative" for the company. Now think about it--Workhorse is a one trick pony with ONE shot at a huge contract and a 1.7 billion market cap and a portion of this government contract would be "transformative". What would a PORTION of a billion dollar contract mean for a company with 1/3 the market cap like PYR???? In other words, if PYR received just one (client A) contract, it could triple in price ($15) and have the same market cap as a company with no huge contract under it's belt at this time--and PYR has more to come in multiple areas. I appreciate you crunching the numbers before investing but you did not think this one through.
(Thsi is a like for like comparison in several areas) PYR vs WKHS
Both companies have a trasformative technology
Both companies could help the environmental cause immensely.
Both are waiting on huge contracts worth many millions of $$