Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Incitec Pivot Ltd T.IPL


Primary Symbol: ICPVF

Incitec Pivot Limited is an Australia-based manufacturer and supplier to the resources and agricultural sectors. Its segments include Asia Pacific and Americas. Asia Pacific segment includes Fertilisers Asia Pacific (Fertilisers APAC) and Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific (DNAP). Fertilisers APAC manufactures and sells fertilizers in Eastern Australia and the export market. It also manufactures, imports and sells industrial chemicals to the agricultural sector and other specialist industries. DNAP manufactures and sells industrial explosives and related products and services to the mining industry in the Asia Pacific region, Turkey and France. Americas segment includes Dyno Nobel Americas, which manufactures and sells industrial explosives and related products and services to the mining, quarrying and construction industries in the Americas (Canada, Mexico and Chile) and initiating systems to businesses in Australia, Turkey and South Africa. It also manufactures and sells industrial chemicals.


OTCPK:ICPVF - Post by User

Comment by Dibah42on Aug 09, 2020 3:19pm
222 Views
Post# 31384823

RE:RE:Another profitable quarter for IPL

RE:RE:Another profitable quarter for IPL
SargeX wrote: My wife & I are long term IPL holders since Mar, 2010. I would beg to differ with you on the IPL management front. To me Bayle seems like a bit of a BTO (Big Time Operator) more interested in growth at any cost so he can collect his big bonuses. He reminds me a lot of ALA's CEO Harris who made huge mistakes with California assests and then the total failure WGL purchase before they finally punted him.

I always thought doing Heratland on its own was a huge mistake and still do. IPL was once a great dividend growth company but now is a bit of a mess. 

At this point, all my wofe & I can do is wait it out and hope all goes reasonably well with Heartland. Lots of risks with it still.

Ciao
  Sarge

rapid_fire_ wrote:

IPL is a money- sash flow machine . The mega project has been a drag on 70-80% of quarter profits, but imagine what happens when it. Ones online in a year ? They have been tossing the idea of a partnership around for years ! Finally they see a partnership on this mega project as the way to go.... but structured in a way IPL can buy a potential partner out with ease . 

amazing management, with very long term vision. 

excellent , conservative energy , pipeline, and polypropylene and other conglomerate company. 

next year at this time I would be shocked if it's under 19.00-22.00. Should be about 24- 26.00 / share next years 




Sargex; 
No question there's risk. But it's the old adage: no risk no reward.  IPL is at a juncture which reminds me of where NPI was a few years back.  NPI had made a humungous bet of multi $$$billions on two mega wind projects off shore in the North Sea. The only talk we heard from the pundits was about risk, conveniently forgetting that upon the completion of the projects the company stood to add $$$500MILLION in annual EBIDAT !!!  Roughly the same amount projected by mgmt upon completion of HL.   In those depressing days NPI stock languished in the mid teens.  Look where it is today.
Of course the two businesses are different and NPI had firm contracts.  A partnership would diminish risk.  However, if they bring HL to fruition without a partner then the reward is entirely and exclusively theirs.
Cheers 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>