pure speculation butno way bcsc takes this long to review 3 clean BARs. None of the acquisitions hadany significant assets. I dont think they had any significant expense either. No salaries either. Dilution was huge. It would be interesting to know who owned the 3 companies. If it was the same people would shrm have needed a shareholder vote and not bars? Did insiders get stock somehow? Would this type of bs cause a lot of delays?