RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New York Times Article - Ucore MentionedLol, you guys are so bias...LAMP is using SX for extraction, so they claim they have experience for higher efficiency, so you all believe it (on toilet paper). However, when UCore said RapdiSX has higher efficiency the improved processes that is no good. Wish you guys all the luck with Lynas, don't say I didn't worn you... Ucore is continuing with development, and focus on the Technology...RapidSX in itself is still siginifcant, but when MRT becomes available, the Hybrid will be dominating. When? for MRT, whenever court resolve the litigation, but it is near...what is needed right now is for Ucore to focus on maturing the RapidSX first, and that is what they are doing...read the NR for CDF again, they are working with various teams to solidify the process and prove out the CDF. I don't see any physical plant from any companies (except for old SX plant), so why are you demanding that Ucore have one? So Bias.