Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.


GREY:NMKEF - Post by User

Comment by Tcheckon Aug 20, 2020 7:41pm
123 Views
Post# 31436248

RE:Why did Pallinghurst offer 25 cents last year?

RE:Why did Pallinghurst offer 25 cents last year?the Pallinghurst deal that was never going to happen

they were not serious negotiating a  new financing deal with pallinghurst because the cost overrun clauses of the loan contract with nordic trust  were clearly forbidding them to even entertain the  idea .
nordic trust didnt accept cost overruns under no circumstances. no way to wriggle out of those terms of the loan contract  .maybe they didn t read the contract .the lenders  owned , took over the company from that moment on .


we were not privy to that crucial piece of information .so this was misleading   and me too i fell for it .
why was the stock selling under 20 cents when a deal was going to be struck at 25 .
i saw it as an opportunity .

for me this is blatant deception of the investor
.anyway  i think on top of everything that  the ceo is protected from being sued but i am not sure .

which financial institutions withdrew when the investors moved in ? anybody knows ?
i missed something




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>