RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:100% specificity and selectivity in assymptomaticsIt is not wrong to state that accuracy if you give the statistics, but it makes me wonder the outliers on the other field test that had lower numbers. Not knowing all the factors like possible improper administering of the test, or how far along symptomatic patients in the test were may be pertinent questions. The people supplying the information and the people reporting the information may not be presenting a clear picture with the proper emphasis on the target of whether it works or not, but rather they include possible error due to collection, which is subjective and should be pointed out as an outlier with the data presented. So if a crowd of 50 people without symptoms wish to board a flight and are tested and 3 are tested positive and removed, how is that not a progress. IMO