Quinto5 wrote:
Midas53 wrote: not stellar!
Phase I Eskay Creek 21A and 21C Zones Infill Drilling Highlights:
• 5.05 g/t Au and 449 g/t Ag (11.03 g/t AuEq) over 39.66 m (SK-20-292) – 21A Zone
• 5.47 g/t Au and 9 g/t Ag (5.59 g/t AuEq) over 12.25 m (SK-20-307) – 21C Zone
• 3.59 g/t Au and 14 g/t Ag (3.77 g/t AuEq) over 16.50 m (SK-20-321) – 21C Zone
Well considering that the PEA inferred resource of the 21A zone is 1,330,000@ 5.7AuEq g/t and we got double that in grade is "not stellar". I really don't know what you are looking for?!
Furthermore, the PEA inferred resources in the 21C zone is listed as 2,080,000 @ 2.6 AuEq g/t and both holes have higher AuEq grades.
Now I realized that these holes may be cherry picked from other holes in the program, but these results are better than meh.
I would add that the results are for
- only 8 additional holes, with the majority number of holes are still with the lab;
- as shown in the cross-section, most of the holes show quite decent intercepts with grades greater than 5gpt to illustrate that the current RE (4Moz at 4gpt which is very high for OP) could be increase to 5Moz at 5gpt with extra/infill drilling.
-hole 292 has 11gptAuEq/40m, from 80-120m and a whopping 117gptAuEq/1.5m thanks to a 7190 gptAg on top of 21.2 gptAu at a downhole distance of around 100m which should have been shown in the cross-section. But, it is tabulated in the Table. The Ag conversion is based on a ratio of 72. If silver is moving fster than gold , as Eric Sprott believes, the contribution from Ag would be higher.
GH11
--------