Painted Pony Pete Ltd PDPYF

Investor Help

[astockhmm123456]

A Yes Vote or a No Vote is now irrelevant.
You have a case whether the vote is Yes or No. Being forced to do something after you were told something else is wrong. Once you inform the investing public repeatedly via multiple investor presentations that your product that you have on sale has a certain net asset value then you are making a value statement. If you then give assurances of financial stability for the purpose of getting others to buy your product for the purpose of that implied product value then you should be obligated at minimum to pay what you have indirectly promised. If someone says I have a product A for sale and at worse the product that I am putting up for sale under a range of various scenarios will be worth $4.00 to $14.00 per unit then you should be obligated to at least provide that price per unit. Otherwise, you with the help of your participating associates should at least be responsible for paying the advertised net product price value of your product. False advertisement is wrong and there will be a time when all investors get their fair price for this product with a much higher advertised net value. Sometimes a judge needs to make a decision on whether something is right or wrong. I am just waiting for the vote to be completed. Either way I will be asking one day for what was advertised for my shares whether someone forced me to give them up or not.