VIVO Cannabis Inc. V.PDA

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sales accelerate in july !!!!

[Schaffhausen]

Bringing this to the top again: If anyone here is interested in adding their names to a request for investigation, please message me (not on the board, but through the direct message feature here on stockhouse). I have good evidence from my test and if anyone has anything they could add to the evidence it would certainly help with the request. With a class of concerned shareholders it stands a chance for consideration. Perhaps we can exorcise these demons and send a message to the unscrupulous that VIVO shareholders are active in protecting their equity against manipulation. Cheers, Schaff

Schaffhausen wrote: It wasn't easy for me to come to the conclusion that VIVO has been manipulated, I had to prove it to myself. I spent an afternoon buying into the ask only to watch an automatic bot respond with a minimum sell to the bid price within 2 minutes of every trade i made...10 times in 30 minutes....absolutely unlikely that some normal trader was on the other side. I submit to you that thinly traded penny stocks, like VIVO are the playground for unscrupulous firms playing for there own interests or by proxy for their paying clients. Securities enforcement doesn't stand a chance. This is a risk with VIVO for now, but like I said, I think major interests have been served recently and they will start to slowly back out now, trying to be inconspicuous. Short positions are conveniently dried up over the last six weeks. The best that can come of this situation n the very near term is to see it and take advantage of it. Cheers, Schaff

couver wrote: I don't know, seems a bit too easy to blame it on retail investor ignorance and manipulation. 

Vivo has been around since the beginning and is well known, if there was true value here, if this is actually "artifically low" wouldn't that have already attracted instutional investors? surely everyone isn't waiting for everyone else to get in on this before they do. 

it's my feeling that people know something that I didn't know when I got in and still don't know. I've been waiting a long time to get back to square on this one

For example the auxly case, what are your thoughts on the partnership issues? Could this be a dark cloud that won't clear? Doesn't vivo owe auxly for the "streaming' partnership from some time in the past?

thanks for your input, just questions I can't seem to find answers to