heart of the matter; former poster asked me... Ie.use of device for non intended use, would'nt all the people in FCC have said they are in breach of use? How is it possible that FCC simply stood by did nothing and allowed this to continue on this long. That simply doesnt make any sense or add up. Someone asked me the above so I answered back - thought it might be a rude awakening for some here. I write back... GREAT QUESTION you caught on quick as it took me months to understand that I needed to ask that question; you are much more clear about the subject matter now I expect good for you and thanks for taking the time.. The FCC gives a certificate based on how your device fits in its classifications. Patriot One FCC application, operating manual, installation guide, installation instructions, test setup, test report, cover letter all by Patriot One makes no statement that they intended to use CMR as a security screener. FCC certificate was approved solely based on the frequencies they proport being Ultra Wide Band.
I found it here https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2002/fcc02048.pdf Page 88 quote (take a look there)
Patriot One never refined the bandwidth it was trying to test on it simply even today says it will cut through all bandwidth 300-4800MHZ...see here even today the sales brochure https://mk0patriot1techaqf19.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Patriot-One-PATSCAN-CMR-Flyer.pdf
freq. 300-4800MHz
Since they did not refine bandwidth FCC classified CMR as a wall scanner a highly restricted device.
I challenge you to show me in FCC application anywhere where it says PAT will use the device as a security screener; I am telling you even the picture they use
is ambiguous see this page https://fccid.io/2ALZTCMR/Users-Manual/Operational-Manual-3551732
that picture is not a guy being screened, there is no planters showing the hidden CMR device that picture was used to deceive shareholders into believing he was walked through a screener in the doorway; note-the doorway material is to dense for a security screener... wake up people wake up
Patriot One never defined the bandwidth it was trying to test on it simply even today says it will cut through all bandwidth 300-4800MHZ...see here even today the sales brochure https://mk0patriot1techaqf19.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Patriot-One-PATSCAN-CMR-Flyer.pdf
freq. 300-4800MHz
Since they did not define bandwidth FCC said ok then your a wall scanner a highly restricted device.
I challenge you to show me in FCC application anywhere where it says PAT will use the device as a security screener; I am telling you even the picture they use
is ambiguous see this page https://fccid.io/2ALZTCMR/Users-Manual/Operational-Manual-3551732
that picture is not a guy being screened, there is no planters showing the hidden CMR device that picture was used to deceive shareholders into believing he was walked through a screener in the doorway; note-the doorway material is to dense for a security screener