PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Trading

[amillionorbust]

umm. Nope, your original post said end of sept. That's it. Shall I highlight it? Just Concede. 

macallan25 wrote: Hey buddy. Here, let me save u the trouble. I'm not hiding. A, B and C = $5B by end of September or later as my post said - October is later.

macallan25 wrote: Sure. 35 days (or whenever A B C actually get done). Might be end of September, could be later. We will see. I am confident deal will be for 500 torches or more, various clauses in contract related to what you are referring too (warranty, maintenance, etc). If it is indeed Vale who did a $1.5B raise, I'm pretty confident they didn't raise that to spend in $150M tranches. But agreed, touch base around end of September. Screenshotting your name to know who to reply back to haha. Regardless, just want the stock to do what I believe it can and will...

amillionorbust wrote:

okay Macallan. Agree to disagree. Let's touch base in 35 days and see who was right.

 

macallan25 wrote: U and fdfd12 are living in some alternate reality or something. If u read Peter's comments and watched his videos you would understand that he is eluding to billion dollar deals not happening overnight. Maybe you misconstrue that to mean small orders to start. Actually, no. To the contrary, he is likely referring to the time it takes to close the contract. He is dealing with MAJOR players. Pen to paper takes time with all deal points for both sides. Working through this first massive torch deal is a huge endeavor and per the JULY 2 NR, purchase discussions are expected to be completed by the end of August (Client A). Nevermind B and C likely by end of September or earlier. We already know there is NO ADVERSE IMPACT of removing the burners on diesel furnaces and bolting on PYR torches. From that NR, PYR plasma torches: "... (i) had absolutely no ancillary detrimental effects anywhere in the process or with their furnaces, (ii) resulted in significant greenhouse gas reduction while at the same time, (iii) projecting significant additional benefits." So, to me the "dip the toe in the water" approach is nonsensical. They are way past that. The longer Client A (etc) wait to get the torches installed the longer it takes for the ultimate benefit realization: significantly reduced GHG emissions = significant cost savings. Further, these torches have gone through extensive modelling including a 6-week extension to make sure it is configured to client preferences. End of Q3...expect big numbers. $B's not $M's.

 

amillionorbust wrote:

$5B by end of sept?!! I hate to sound like a broken record but how many times do we need to cut and paste Peters comments regarding the elusive $$billions of dollars contracts? It's not happening that way folks. It just isn't. Stop saying stupid things that dumb down the billboard. Smart people don't bet their careers on a billion dollar contract that could potentially sewer their reputation. They'll dip their toe in the water. Maybe a $150 million deal "with an option to secure another $300 million worth in 6 mths at the same price" or some similar clause. Then See how the product is working. See how pyro backs the product if there is an issue. It will eventually lead to bigger deals as the company gets validated. GO PYR!!!!

 

fdfd12 wrote: Yes you are right. Those contracts will make the EPS from .10 to $5 for each Q.
$20 for the yfear with a multiple of 30 we get a stock of $600.

That is great.
Thanks for informing me macallan

 

 

macallan25 wrote: Man u r ignorant. Peter only talks EPS based on what's guaranteed. 0.11 is guaranteed on less than $40M. He is about to close $5B by end of September, earnings of $2B. To run thru the contracts let's say 18 months. 2B/6 for arguments sake. That is earnings of $300M per quarter or $2 EPS. NO multiple factored in. By the time the A B and C are executed, total EPS for the 18 months would be over $12. NO forward earnings. NO other contracts. He has a backlog of existing contracts, is in discussions with another 10 companies likely. This stock will be > $100 in 2021. Book it. Too much earnings, too few shares. Anyone who believes in this stock understands that. Like x10 earnings is $120 on 3 clients give or take. Give your head a shake on the 0.1 per quarter. It's absolutely laughable.

fdfd12 wrote: KING you are so WRONG.
My EPS of .40 is a good estimate.

Remember, your hero Peter said .11 for the entire 2020 year.

I am saying .10 for each Q next year.
I am more optimistic than Peter.

TELL ME, how can the stock get to $20 this year if Peter (your hero)
says the EPS for the year will be .11 TOTAL..

ARE YOU NUTS!!

Stop scamming this board. Enough is Enough

kingscorpion wrote: If you didn't yap the stock would be higher infact. Go shoot yourself in the foot at some other bull board I am already tired of you popping in and out like a ginnie Ohh all those contracts are lined up and fd thinks EPS at .40c What planet are you from From day one you showed up here you ve done nothing but talk negative to semi negative about the company and for your information when one of these contracts is signed the s.p will double and the year end target price is $20 and I am hoping I am conservative with my year end price