FormerXBC Inc XEBEQ

RE:RE:Solar & Wind

[ZouZS3]

The takeover of the environmental movement by capitalism may now be complete and there is no question that it will benefit Xebec. I'm just saying it is absurd to think that one day we'll be completely independent from coal and fossil fuels. The green movement can't be going against them. On the contrary, I believe that the green movement have to be partner with the fossil fuel industry for R&Ds and collaborate to reduce our carbon footprint . Mining, transportation, refining and manufacturing of material inputs to the green energy solution would be powered mainly by fossil fuels. Coal and natural gas power plants have much larger carbon footprints, even if they're using carbon capture equipment to store their emissions. Biomass & biofuels is by far the largest portion of green energy around the world. Xebec technological advances is huge to solve these issues. It's the only company in the world that has the most efficient and advanced equipment to solve the carbon emissions. Why would Canada state that it has an opportunity to be a worldwide leader in the green movement. Such a big statement. I can only think of Xebec when I read this, the only company that is trying to clean up the mess of biomass and biofuels carbon footprint compared to solar and wind. Moreover, they will be a major player in being able to save lots of money for industrial businesses who will want to reduce their carbon tax liability. Xebec is in the biogas "upgrading solutions" business. Xebec installs biogas-to-RNG upgrading systems, H2 purification systems, natural gas dehydration units for refueling stations, and systems for generating Renewable Hydrogen (RH2)which includes H2 filtration and separation products. Solar and wind energy are not feasible replacements for fossil fuels because theyre intermittent energy sources that need to be supplemented by nonrenewable sources, and because the manufacture of solar panels and windmills is environmentally destructive. solar panels are made of quartz and coal in a process that is anything but energy-efficient. A green festival was supposed to be powered by solar energy but when it rained, they switched to biodiesel and then ended up plugging into the electrical grid. Electric cars are bad because theyre charged through the existing power grid, and because theyre made of materials that take a lot of energy to produce

Possibleidiot01 wrote: ZouZs3

I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying ( after all possible idiocy?) . You started off saying your portfolio is 100% Xebec and fully leveraged.
Then you went to

"Green energy will never replace coal and fossil fuels. Biomass and biofuels would just make us burn more coal and and ramp up production of fossil fuels. If the Koch brothers wouldn't be benefiting from this green transition none of this would be possible. Green energy is just an illusion for environmentalists and there is no doubt that it will benefit the coal and fossil fuel industry."
Then you questioned the ESG industry.

"When you divest from fossil fuels and invest in green funds? What are you investing in?"

"The sun and the wind are not always there. They will always be dependent on the traditional grid. Those betting in favor of Solar & Wind are making a big mistake."

Now I think what you are saying is Xebec is more viable than most environmentally good power producers   but  you don't state why. I would be interested in your reasons why Xebec has your money and other methods  don't.
I do understand your skepticism re green washing . I could possibly argue with "Biomass and biofuels would just make us burn more coal and and ramp up production of fossil fuels." and "there is no doubt that it will benefit the coal and fossil fuel industry."