RE:Munch App is not the problemSAMESOCALCALM wrote: I can address that via the very same question I posed to Dr. Sen and here was his response. "The license has nothing to do with a specific method. There are many ways of making cannabis extract as long as it passes the standard tests to assure consistency and lack of pestcides, harmful chemicals, germs etc. The license relates to cannabis 2.0 extracts and products made with them". I hope that helps and once the licsense is recieved and beverages and edibles can be produced is what I understand Munch. Hey Scum just because Dr. Sen resides in Florida and I reside in the Pacific Northwest Fedor, we can speak over the phone or via text. Tech is a wonderful thing numskull you and your band of scum brothers. LOL creeps!!! SoCal heading out to enjoy his day sitting on my beautiful 5 acres over looking the Sound while you scum can type your dribble and nonsense. Bye bye.
Thanks SSC, this is good insight.
Although it reinforces my concern that SPR has not been able to secure an edible arrangement given it's apparent advantages. Perhpas there is a valid reason for this, but I'm struggling to find one.