RE:RE:Thanks for not taking my questions at conference...Hey DSEEGS, if I'm not mistaken you are still (or were) an aph shareholder?
You're right, Canopy is as of now more poised to gain than Apha should the Dems win and legalize pot. However, Apha has expressed their intention to purchase a non-cannaplay in the US (like a pharmacy, etc.) to position ourselves in a similar manner to that which has made us successful in Europe (Germany). It's a different approach.
But let's be honest: Apha's revenues are still far higher than Canopy's, our fundamentals are far better, and we are taking more market share, it appears.
Regardless, GLTA longs, and may the shorts go eff themselves.
DSEEGS wrote: hevin wrote: They were
a) why did the excise taxes TRIPLE? (we would have made a profit otherwise)
b) considering apha again didn't make a profit, and to maximize shareholder value, as they claim they want to do, why not have the C-suite take a temporary salary reduction?
Disappointed in the results, especially the gross revenue. For the first time, we've gone backwards.
Good news? The US election will change the houses to Dems who will legalize pot.
How does that help Aphria? They have no in on U.S operations yet. SOme investors COUGH COUGh Savage from Aph board come over to Canopy board and criticise them for banking on this very thing . Canopy is ahead of the game in this aspect and now Aph investors see why.
*This comment doesnt apply to most here.