PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s): PYRGF

Industrials Technology

PyroGenesis Inc., formerly PyroGenesis Canada Inc., is a Canada-based high-tech company. The Company is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG). The Company has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore palletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing. It provides engineering and manufacturing expertise, contract research, as well as turnkey process equipment packages to the defense, metallurgical, mining, additive manufacturing (including 3D printing), oil and gas, and environmental industries. Its products and services include plasma atomized metal powders, aluminum and zinc dross recovery, waste management, plasma torches, and innovation/custom process development. It offers PUREVAP, which is a high purity metallurgical grade silicon and solar grade silicon from quartz.

TSX:PYR - Post by User

PyroGenesis Inc

Bullboard Posts

Comment by SmiteWorxon Oct 15, 2020 12:42pm

250 Views

Post# 31721693

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PUREVAP NANO News Release highlighted and interview

Good luck with Biden. The dems will kindly redistribute all the millions you just made in the stock market with PYR. Say goodbye to your freedom.

Thinkbigsti69 wrote: It will only be understood once Biden gets in. The real power of the green cos will be supported by the stock markets when and only when this happens.

Casavantsghost wrote: I wonder how many people grasped the enormity of this press release and it’s revelation?

The issue with silicon as a component of the anode is expansion and cracking as that byproduct.

This coating and proper sizing of the sphere IN ONE STEP may have solved that.

It will be tested by one or all of HPQ’s NDA partners.

I’m more curious to know if Tesla is using HPQ’s powders and seemingly developed their own process to coat the nano powders with a “polymer”.. or are they developing nana powders themselves and coating?

If they are developing nano powders themselves.... then how? And is their process commercially scalable without tremendous capex as has been conveyed by Bernard to achieve.

Not that Tesla doesn’t have the money to do so but if in the end they can contract out supply to a company already positioned to ramp up to 3-5 tons a year by next summer as stated by Bernard on Agoracom yesterday, then why spend the whatever billions on brick and mortar.

A logical argument for them TO spend on the brick and mortar would be for they themselves to be a user AND supplier on a massive global scale as we transition to EV’s.

There is plenty of room for two players no doubt. It will be interesting to see which coated silicon coated particle (polymer vs carbon) performs better.