Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  BDRPF | T.BBD.PR.B | BDRXF | T.BBD.PR.C | T.BBD.PR.D | BOMBF | BDRAF | T.BBD.B | BDRBF

Bombardier Inc. is a Canada-based manufacturer of business aircraft with a global network of service centers. The Company is focused on designing, manufacturing and servicing business jets. The Company has a worldwide fleet of more than 5,000 aircraft in service with a variety of multinational corporations, charter and fractional ownership providers, governments and private individuals. It operates aerostructure, assembly and completion facilities in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Its robust customer support network services the Learjet, Challenger and Global families of aircraft, and includes facilities in strategic locations in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China and Australia. The Company's jets include Challenger 350, Challenger 3500, Challenger 650, Global 5500, Global 6500, Global 7500 and Global 8000.


TSX:BBD.A - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Jim99999on Oct 17, 2020 10:42am
157 Views
Post# 31734141

RE:RE:How much debt will be left after BT sale?

RE:RE:How much debt will be left after BT sale?Nice analysis, pablo87. Didn't quite follow you at the highlighted text. Could you elaborate your thinking w/r/t interest expense and how it will affect debt in H2? Thanks,

Jim


pablo87 wrote: My best guess:

The Q2 cash position is 2.7B, pro-forma the full $1B loan from Apollo. Pro-forma debt is thus $10.3B.

The BT proceeds will be 5.3B Euro per Alstom CEO.  After returning CDPQ $2.1B and the $386M CDPQ invested in Q1, that leaves Bombardier with $3.2B proceeds and $500M in shares (which is as good as cash...).  That includes the $414M Bombardier invested in Q2.

They may still have upside on that BT figure, on what basis we don't know, Q3 and Q4 EBIT perhaps? That upside seems more or less shared 50/50 with CDPQ.  So perhaps another $100M.

That leaves us with pro-forma net debt of $3.8B. Add Q3/Q4 interest costs to that so $4.2B.

To that you would add in Belfast proceeds, Q3/Q4 BA EBITDA, working capital fluctuations (probably negative due to declining backlog) and the service centre partner buyout (undisclosed).  $500M in the positive perhaps?

Leaves us with $3.7B net debt. Does not include working capital surplus or deficit.

As you can see, lots of assumptions and uncertainty.

Originally they had said $2.6B.  BT seems to be a wash - they underestimated the legacy costs, there is going to be a revenue and EBIT shortfall for the year as well. On the other hand, the exchange rate has been favorable (1.17 vs 1.10).  So it seems the difference is going to be mostly on the BA side - less deliveries so less revenue so less EBIT, and less bookings so drop in backlog and less cash coming in.

A final twist (my own speculation): Bombardier may still have an option on CDPQ's share of BT and thus Alstom - the CFO specifically said during the Q1 conference call that the agreement was still in place. If that is the case, and they exercised that option, the debt would obviously go up by ~$2.2B.  Seems crazy but that could be a defensive move IMO.  Would not surprise me in the least.

GLTA


Bullboard Posts