RE:The criminal suit against Ossa is extendedMr. Ossa probably got the Sentencia of C 719-2011 the same way I did. And I do have a copy. While the verdict was unavailable in the documents of the original lawsuit, it is posted plain as day in the Ingresso document of the appeal of C 719-2011, Appeal 39-2016 on the Judiciary website. The verdict appears on page 24 through page 41 of the pdf.
Just to prove I do have the verdict, here are the Court's decisions:
Procedimiento Civil, se resuelve:
I.- Que, se rechaza la objecion documental de fojas 36.
II. - Que, se rechaza la objecion documental de fojas 282.
III. - Que, se acoge la objecion documental de fojas 318.
IV. - Que, se rechazan la objeciones documentales de fojas 353 y 362.
V, - Que, se acoge la tacha de fojas 169 respecto del testigo Jorge Lopehandia Cortes.
VI. - Que, se rechaza la tacha de fojas 183 respecto del testigo Catalino de la Cruz Albanez Vergara.
VII. - Que, se rechaza la demanda de fojas 03 y su ampliacion de fojas 08.
VIII. Que, se condena en cotas a la demandante.
Anotese, registrese, notifiquese y archivense los autos en su oportunidad
Rol C-719-2011
~
The reason the court accepted that JL's testimony was flawed was rather humorous. At least, I though so. I may post that at some time.