TSX:HSE.PR.B - Post by User
Comment by
RagingBull3on Oct 27, 2020 1:00pm
78 Views
Post# 31788997
RE:RE:RE:RE:Preferred Shares
RE:RE:RE:RE:Preferred SharesIt's like calling a Cat a Dog..... Effectively it would be ONE company. Cenovus would have complete control most likely. Having Husky as a "subsidary" to make it look like it's 2 separate companies is just more BS.
Anyways, just my opinion.
rad10 wrote: Always thankful for James Hymas' blog - exceptional resource. Surprised at his take though. The last thing I want is an unlisted security, and the merger is a done deal. The thinking there will be a persistent differential in the rating between the two merged entities is counter- intuitive. HSE / CVE preferred - once merged - it's academic isn't it?
I bow to his detailed knowledge and expertise in this field. I might send him an email.
cheers
Number13 wrote:
I think what James is saying is that Husky would still exist. It's assets would still be held in Husky. Thus when CVE refines oil in a Husky refinery, there would have to be a contract between CVE and HSE. Husky would not be wound up.
its a possibility to do this, but I don't think this is the intention of CVE. They want all the assets under CVE, not a disjointed company.
the problem with asking for $25 is that it might be too rich to work given how many pref shares are outstanding. If $25 was CVE's only option, they'd probably just rather walk way from the deal, or alternative just have the accounting pain in the a$$ with the paperwork and filings to keep HSE a separate entity. However, for something like 50% above the pref market price on Oct 23rd (as opposed to $25) that might be worth it for them to have the ability to wind up HSE into CVE. I'm holding out for a way better deal.