RE:RE:RE:Aldo, your comment on 2013Spoken like a true politician, deflecting questions and facts without backing up his negative and false statements and changing subject title along the way in order to break the thread making it difficult to go back to your original nonsense post.
You’re (not “your” BTW idiot) the biggest moron/basher/shorty on this board.
Anyway, that is all you’ll get from me, people on this board deserve better content than this exchange.
GunnerG wrote: You didn't know until I told you, LOL.
Even now your confused "
who knows". Well I know, and I explained it to you.
"
guess you have to multiply the volume by 1,000". Man your a slow learner, yes you need to multiply by 1,000.
Now start working on the dilution information. It will show you your $1.9T comment was just DUMB.
aldo451 wrote: I know it says $450 back in 2013, that is where I got the information. And no, it appears I'm right, the listings are just a conversion at 1000/1, even the volume doesn’t make sense. According to NAS historical data you are quotung, on April 27, 2016 (at its peak) it closed at $2740 USD with a volume of 87 shares traded,
guess you have to multiply the volume by 1000, who knows. Give it break man, you don’t know what the fk you are talking about… it’s all about the MC shorty!
I’m done.
GunnerG wrote: SP is condescending.
" In Feb 2013 (way before the major restructuring) it was trading at $0.45. So, with your logic the shares were worth $450 back then!"
If you have a look at the NAS 10 year chart you will see the SP is showing as $450. What what........
Appears I am right and I will leave it up to you to try and understand the rest.