Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SSC Security Services Corp Ordinary Shares V.INP


Primary Symbol: INPCF

Consumer Defensive Industrials Household & Personal Products Security & Protection Services
SSC Security Services Corp is a leading provider of physical and cyber security services to corporate and public sector clients across Canada.


OTCPK:INPCF - Post by User

SSC Security Services Corp Ordinary Shares > Grudge against BOD
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(125)
•••
Comment by schocoron Oct 30, 2020 10:24am
73 Views
Post# 31812520

RE:RE:RE:Grudge against BOD

RE:RE:RE:Grudge against BOD
Bookends wrote: What's pretty bad, was that in the initial PR about the deal, they had mentionned it wasn't conditional to financing... Meaning they had seen a proof of the cash to be used, or of the financing already accepted. 

Clearly that was missleading and false!


Do you know what the conditional means in a legal/financial context? I don't think you do. Plus, your assumptions about what they had and had not seen are what is truly misleading here. Try that post again.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities