RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I'd say a 50% chance we get news today Why do you work so hard to discredit a stock you claim to own ? Always putting a negative spin on things when everything you emphasize clearly has no cause for concern for any level headed investor ! At what point will you and your parasitic intention move on to the next victim company ? Is it the uplist or certain share value or are you staying for good trying to suck the life out of this ?
fdfd12 wrote: Every bought deal says "on or about" but always closes on that date. Also you are right, the GSI was delayed. First time I have seen that.
The only thing with GSI is that the buyer is not in Canada which the company said it is the reason for the delay and also the buyer is paying a premium of $1.00 where the stock is at .80.
I am not sure Mackie is in Canada so no excuse for out of Canada.
Hopefully it will close before the market Monday.
Peacefultrader wrote: I was only focus on three stocks currently, and one of them GSI was just delayed bought deal. If you have not seen any delay in 20 years. You are totally blind or having metal issue. Go hospital.
Also, it is not a delay yet because PR said on or about.
fdfd12 wrote: I am completley telling the truth.
You don't like what you hear, so you dribble drabble.
Show one one news release in the past where someone has said, we are late.
SHOW ME!!!!
lettermen7 wrote: bleeble blabble here fdfd12 with your posts, you're done, you're gone with your dribble drabble.
fdfd12 wrote: 100% agree. In my 20 years, I have not seen a closing date delayed.
I am surprised that it hasn't closed.
Everyone one this board is coming up with excuses of why it didn't.
After 20 years, there is always a first (PYR).
Topofthemorning wrote: 99% of all bought deals close on the specified date of the press release. I completely understand the " on or about" terminology but it doesn't make the company look like they know what they're doing. Let's hope there's a solid reason behind this.