Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Husky Energy Inc. cumulative redeemable preferred T.HSE.PR.B



TSX:HSE.PR.B - Post by User

Comment by RagingBull3on Oct 31, 2020 4:12pm
106 Views
Post# 31818999

RE:Clarity on Preferred Shares

RE:Clarity on Preferred SharesRe-read the Prospectus and the Husky/Cenovus News Release.   IMHO, what you are saying is WRONG.      

Anyways, bottom line effectively Husky will be winding up its affairs and be no more.    You can try to call it a "merge" and say there will be a "subsidary".... but that's calling a Cat a Dog because you claim the Cat has a fur coat just like the Dog.

The Subsidary will be a shell, the only reason to create it is because of the Preferreds... an attempt to bypass the $25/share redemption term.

All just my opinion.



Number13 wrote:

Seems like there is quite the debate regarding the preferred shares. To be clear, in order for the companies to MERGE, the preferred shareholders have to agree with a two thirds vote. 

However, if CVE wants to buy HSE and operate it as a SEPARATE entity (I.e. purchase all the common shares but not the prefs), that would not require the consent of the pref share holders. However, there would be less operational cost savings by operating two separate companies. 

I recommend interested parties to visit prefblog.com and look at the posting by Pref share expert James Hymas (Oct 27th) including posts in the comments section.

After reading the prospectus and his comments, I will be voting no to a share conversion.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>