RE:RE:RE:Questions for Old Dog I think what is different here is you have a CEO that has a proven record of getting things done. Don't get me wrong at this stage it's a wee bit of a cluster box....but bringing something to market is never a piece of cake...if it was everyone would be doing it. What I see different here is that the CEO does have that proven track record and that this is the type of Tech that will come into its own sooner than later. No one foresaw the Covid 19 issue or the way it would radically affect the heart. Considering the amount of cases in the US alone They racked up 100K new cases today...and are just 100K short of 10 million cases. If just 2% of those people require monitoring for a period of time your talking 200,000 repeat visits to the doctor to monitor their covid 19 heart damage.
I see many things here....but it all comes down to acceptance of the product which at this stage of the game is not even an issue due to the constant modifications/enhancements. I see multiple reasons/medical impairment reasons.....old age...chemo...covid...that will lead to a heavier usage requirement than even the CEO is forcasting. I see a constant revenue stream from usage that will increase.....I mean everywhere I look for weakness I can't find it...yes the company is walking a tight line right now as far as cash runway...but that should peel off pretty soon.
Once the company gets more units out there it should have brokers looking to get into it.
Back to HUGE....there were two things that always made me wonder ...the voting shares...what 6 people could vote????......second was the "Australian Model"....When the ceo said that I had schivers going through me...Austalian Model...what the Dell is that I thought...what did they have 1.3 billion shares????...
old_dog