RE:RE:Unreasonable concerns???Also, it's important to note that PYR's focus has changed, and with that they've become sexier to analysts. Before it was a fairly straightforward niche industrial product maker with small market potential. Now with the shift to iron ore pelletization and silicon powders, it's huge market potential.
MidtownGuy wrote: There's no bad questions man. Don't feel afraid to ask.
Analyst coverage and volume are a venture exchange issue.
Analysts hardly ever follow (or are way way less likely to follow) venture exchange companies, because they are normally earlier stage and less likely to be mature enough in their tech to be followed (mining companies notwithstanding) and of interest to analysts.
Volume is low with venture aside from unicorns like FD and SONA etc.
PYR volume is low these days because it's in a holding pattern vis a vis contracts pending, and everyone who owns or trades it knows this. So it's a standoff, as nobody wants to sell until they know contract results at miminum.
rummager wrote: I have no trouble conceding that the optimists - avoid the use of the "pumper" pejorative - on this board may know a lot more about this company than I do. What prevents me from going 'all in' are two things: low volume and no analysts following. Surely, if there are billion dollar contracts iminent, there would be hundreds of people in the know with cascading tips for people with real money. It almost always shows up in volume, legalities aside. Volume says it is not happening. As for analysts... a company that has been around for several years with so many supposedly hot irons in the fire, led by a CEO with a fiancial background, and, no one from the financial community following??? It tempers my enthusiasm and holds me to just 3000 shares. Would gladly welcome considerate replies to the contrary outling why those concerns are unreasonable.