RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: Peter has a surprise in store for us after funding closes . You made a statement about companies not spending a billion dollars on something. Companies like Verizon spend billions on "things" often. It's as easy as that. It's called Capex. They ARE the same. Money is exchanged for something. I am only pointing this out because your statement sews seeds of doubt and it is not warrented at this time.
Modeling. It was completed as per PR for company A so not sure what your are stating here.
Either B or C wanted to skip modeling.
canyousayiii wrote: No, my friend, I made a comment, you cited an example saying my comment was incorrect and that example was not comparable. My comment was about equipment purchases and you come up with rights to use the spectrum. Physical equipment, rights to use RF spectrum, not the same. Anyhow, who cares....lets see what Peter signs....i dont think there will be anything close to one billion with one client right off the bat. One thing holding this back is modelling. Not 100% the same as having a product run in live environment.
Casavantsghost wrote: Ok, so you are not a very bright individual but you are probably very nice just the same.. Cell phones use RF poopsie..
https://www.investors.com/news/technology/verizon-likely-biggest-bidder-5g-wireless-spectrum-auction/
canyousayiii wrote: Ok, so your company is about to write a $10 billion checkbfor cellphones. When does it expect delivery? And then how quickly are they going to resell them?
Casavantsghost wrote: You own a cell phone?
canyousayiii wrote: Please elaborate on what the RF radio spectrum is. Is it a right to emit signals of certain frequency or is it a specific piece of equipment. But I am not sure that I can be incorrect in saying that $1 billion checks are not easily written for equipment...or equipment purchase that would constitute 300 pieces.
Casavantsghost wrote: You are incorrect. Company I work for is about to spend $10 billion on RF radio spectrum and has spent money like that time and time again on spectrum and of other ventures .
If it’s Vale, the year have the coin as well so you’re statement is incorrect.
canyousayiii wrote: Yup, folk better get use to the idea that there will be a series of contracts over time for clients with multiple locations rather than one huge one. Companies dont so easily write $1 billion checks for equipment. To me, a good start would be 10 torches, to many here it would be 50 in essence for outfitting one plant, a few expect, or at least say so, 100s. I think 50 would be fantastic. And if there was more than one such client within a month of each other, that would exceed my expectations. GL.