Snowfield compare it with Alaska open pit gold minesManagement and board sit still with tight mouth and hands about our huge Snowfield deposit. Less than 400 thousand USD were spend in Q3 for only ~ 1,000 meter further exploration drill at Snowfield. Sounds like an "alibi drill".
All this though our "Snowfield" shows these execellent resource figures in the 2011 techn. report:
And further we have at Snowfield clean hyroelectric power around the corner ... !!!
Compare it with another northern open pit mine over there in Alaska. Kinross is working in Alaska with success at much lower grades at their "Fort Knox" open pit mine. Now Kinross is even working there on an expansion called "Gil-Sourdough" of the existing "Fort Knox" open pit mine in Alaska. Further they bought "Peak Gold" for another satellite mine project there.
...
According to the most recent calculation published by Kinross, Gil-Sourdough hosts 29.5 million metric tons of indicated resource averaging 0.56 g/t (533,000) oz. of gold...
Why constant public downplaying of our super "Snowfield" deposit by PVG management and board? It is a real riddle for me... ! Let us hope that they can show up great pending assay results for done drills within next weeks. This would be the most positive reason for downplaying Snowfield: that they are really on the trail for a second Brucejack kind deposit on our large piece of land.
------------- source of the quote and interesting article about this Alaska open pit mining made by Kinross:
https://www.miningnewsnorth.com/story/2020/10/23/news/golden-decade-coming-to-fort-knox-mine/6500.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=0d7a5aadf57ca1ba5b0735a324ffcc899fa131fc-1604876873-0-AQh5Xli8wRkbycH4fm6Sk8MRRtyaWGTD_Ap15tOrbMUble6CiAeYvtBjR6HPV-1Ojt-Gzod5a1LSnuF9B5zrB7T0JI-fdTl_AxPWVq43OiHC3G7OaVIJTw_XVWYr5UMwxR8uJhFUjWCQiIZ6Jh-utcNydJ0RjSMG99uMzbuk52qvwUHHMy8zC3ohDXlR5V61wFh58LOeiTyz8I5ZAq1s5sov7RAgnMvELPCD42PDgKYbndTiidIt-SHa6hSGWDyCdXKac82qs1N6EVcNfpR7Va-DtCroi9At57f4gj28lwkUvDs_9Ent2l-OaaN38vtzq06-0yWR1wa9aqNVSB7uW42MVXTm5Qp0WLQZ29etF51H