RE:RE:Re: MoveBasing a current investment decision on a past investment decision (the purchase) is dangerous. Investments should be constantly reviewed as the outlook for every company is ever changing. If you purchased shares in a company based on your previous research and you are now 50% under water, you need to assess why the share price declined. If there is no fundamental change since your original purchase, then averaging down may be the right thing to do. I the case of Denison, as it is not generating enough revenue to reach production, additional financing will still be required (equity, debt, off-take). Financing decisions, progress towards production, and exploration are all fundamental changes to review. When I am making a decision on whether to purchase shares in a company I already own, I like to assume that I do not own shares and consider whether I feel the investment is worth it given the current share price. If I believe it is, I buy. If I believe it isnt, I sell my current holdings. If I dont think buying it has strong prospects for profit, then why would I hold it? I personally believe in Denison and am continuing to hold long term. I have averaged down several times from my original purchase around 10 years ago at $1.20. In a uranium bull market, I think $5 is attainable, however I will have exited much of my position prior to reaching that level unless there is a major fundamental change such as exploration results hitting another major deposit.