RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Derivative demandThanks-I had not seen that. All the rhetoric aside, if you were Terry Booth, this is what I would say to you,
- Why choose ex/current Aurora people and others who have zero depth in US business (cannabis especially). If they do, why not articulate that properly?
- There is no mention of a management team in the deck. Why not?
- You (Booth) need to articulate your own intention. Your in, then out, not involved in anything to do with the board/mgmt? What is your future intent?
- The white elephant in the room has to be dealt with; Aurora and the $3 billion write down. How would you explain that, what have you learned, and what will you do differently at AUSA.
- There are incestious ties by Dyck, Szweras (your counsel) and Fu to Nutritional High.It is a garbage company and I would need to know that it will never be a consideration for AUSA or if there is value, what is it? The optics of Dyck joining their board are questionable to me.
- Duke Fu- little doubt that you structured a deal with him to garner his vote so what is it and what will the cost be to shareholders of AUSA?
- Where EXACTLY, will you get capital from? (I am very concerned about this given what happened at Aurora and possible legacy implications.)
So, there you go Terry Booth. You answer those questions to my satisfaction, I will question my vote. Oh, you might want to think about 'excite, ignite and delight', this is not a spicy fast food take out stand.
chipper63 wrote: https://fixaustralis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Investor-Presentation.pdf