Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Liminal BioSciences Inc. LMNL

Liminal BioSciences is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, small molecule drug candidates for the treatment of patients suffering from fibrotic or inflammatory diseases that have a high unmet medical need. Liminal BioSciences operates on an integrated basis from our talent hubs in Laval, Quebec, Canada, and Cambridge, UK. Our common shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market.


NDAQ:LMNL - Post by User

Comment by Jackhighon Nov 17, 2020 2:06am
161 Views
Post# 31912462

RE:I don't think it has bottomed yet

RE:I don't think it has bottomed yetPure garbage speculation. It was clearly pointed out in thier news release the reason.

"On November 6, 2020, the FDA notified us that the submission of this additional information by the Company constituted a major amendment because the submission contained substantial new manufacturing or facility information not previously submitted to or reviewed by the FDA, which entitles FDA to extend the review process by three months. The new PDUFA target action date is now June 5, 2021."


Also if you work in the industry like I do (regulatory affairs), you know that introduction of additional information that was not previously disclosed carries a risk of additional review time. In this case the new manfuacturing or faciity information was nessesary to answer FDA's questions, otherwise you dont take that kind of risk. FDA saw the scope of the data and basically says: "we need more time to read, review and understand the data being generated" and to see if they agree with the methodology, data, etc.

DryBones wrote:
The check points are for quality control of drug manufacturing.  I'm  now thinking that the explanation, one more check point was the "light" or PR description of the problem.  I think they have a quality control problem.  I suspect now that their blood plasma filtration process does not work very well, otherwise by now it would have been adopted by other blood fractionators.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>