RE:If Beena gave a shi.t about shareholderstheTransporter wrote: She would have answered the question in the conference call this morning about the proportion of revenue September contributed to Q1 in rec sales.
She decided NOT to be transparent. Answering that quesiton would have given a baseline where Q2 numbers could be estimated, but she avoided answering that. Why?
That was a slap to the face to shareholders.
...on the contrary...had she given those figures than that would have been then standard she would have been "judged" by...this was a conference call not a trial...she gave what she thought she needed to give..she gave an estimate for the future..and that is all she needed to do...Bravo Beena