RE:sandbagging?hmmmmmmmm wrote: I guess if you wanted to sell off Dialco for a thin dime you'd be ok with the sandbagging of a FDA approval.
Can't think of many other reasons...
A follow-up to your posts in Sept ...if I may...
Why would they be motivated to sell-off Dialco for "a thin dime"?
Or as you say in a subsequent post that Dialco will be "kidnapped" from us?
What would be the logic of allowing that to happen hmmmmmm ?
Especially when the only two competitors command a price of $ 2B, albeit a few years ahead on sales and FDA (nome use) approval?
Might they be trying to position Dialco as a serious competitor in this market, once approval happens? While they can try to "go it alone" isn't the more logical route an IPO spin-out or a DA? versus giving it away for a dime after 5-7 yeears of development effort? In a market that suggest much higher need going forward?
MM