Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Husky Energy Inc. cumulative redeemable preferred T.HSE.PR.B



TSX:HSE.PR.B - Post by User

Comment by RagingBull3on Nov 22, 2020 11:16am
132 Views
Post# 31948770

RE:"Anticipated annual run rate synergies of $1.2 billion"

RE:"Anticipated annual run rate synergies of $1.2 billion"Hopefully the companies will come to their senses, honour the agreement, do what not only is their legal responsibility but in the long run probably what's best for the company, shareholders and all other parties..... before it comes to legal blows, in which the company will most likely lose.  

All just my opinion. 

$1.2 Billion in savings every year!!!    What's the one time cost of the Preferreds compared to this???.    Doesn't even have to cost, they can save!  Finance the purchase of the Preferreds at lower cost debt!    Basically exchanging High Cost Debt, with low cost Debt! 

All just my opinion.  


RagingBull3 wrote: Saving in just one year would pay for the Preferreds easily I think.    Plus, companies can finance at lower costs than what the Preferreds are costing the company.  Husky just financed at 3.25% I think.   This is cheaper than what most of the Preferreds are costing.

Legal battle, which the company most likely going to lose, is going to cost them dearly.   I can see not only the company paying $25/share, but punitive damages and court costs, IMHO.  Not only this, for myself as a shareholder, I would trust the company LESS.....this probably would cost the company much much more down the road in terms of share price and additional capital investment or financing.

Company needs to set things right.  It's what's best for the companies, IMHO. 

All just my opinion.





<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>