RE:RE:RE:The CEO's job.(aka-how to catch a basher)It was probably written poorly, another of my many faults.
The point is to give people perspective of what short term increases actually are. Anybody who consistently nails 25% plus year after year through multiple market cycles, and keeps their money invested, is bound to become(or be) foolishly well off.
The context being if we expand our time frame, we can see that in fact, if we are saying Peter is responsible for all of the share price moves(sill in my view), then we must also acknowledge that a ten bagger in less than 10 years is very impressive for any company, anywhere.
The ones who argue it, and you will see them in response fiddling away and niggling at things, are you monday to friday, 10-430 bashing crew.
Cheers!
MakeItRain1 wrote: I missed the 5 years in your post, I see where you got your number now.