RE:RE:RE:Slow is smooth and smooth is fast! discussed is a strong word when such previous mentions had more to do with short term price manipulations than well based arguments regarding the company. The basher title comes with the context of screaming into the void rather than a well balanced discussion as I believe that your current comment is more reflective of. No need to go on about how everyone's pumping - we just think it's going to be successful. Proof is in peters putting
canyousayiii wrote: And was this not whaf had been discussed many times beforw by "bashers" who were told that modelling served that purpose, there was no issue with plug and play and the order wont be a few torches? And they were jumped upon and Peter's stuff was cited to show why that was not the case, etc, etc. No issue with the client's diligence, big issue with how Peter lined up expectations and never realigned them while knowing some of what was being said on social media. Of course none of thos stuff was done for one torch, but the other obvious thing is that it is not Peter running the whole show but the clients have a bigger say. I will now ask, do torches jusf reducd GHGs or are they much cheaper to operate? If just GHGs, then better accept the "slow". Which is still good, buf then you can slice you SP predictions significantly because the market prices the timing of cashflows as well. Excellent points because that is how business works....clients make payments.