RE:RE:RE:RE:The market already knewAnd part of the deal is that P then throws the analyst under the bus in a press release? And McW would be OK with folk ridiculing him? I dont think so. The proxy is common sense that nobody willbcut a $1 billion check for something that has been modelled, and I had to argue against a few that this was big money.
politicat wrote: McW was told by Peter to say what he said.
There is no way McW is going to get on national TV and " guess " his way through an analysis of PYR ( which happens to contradict his assessment from 3 months earlier).
He knew the initial torch sales would be small ... for testing.
So it is not PP vs McW .... next time McW talks about PYR I will look at him as being a proxy for PP.