TSXV:EVE.H - Post by User
Comment by
reallyBobbyZon Nov 27, 2020 5:41pm
79 Views
Post# 31992921
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:HINT to PUMPERS...Why a Q3 $4.22 million loss?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:HINT to PUMPERS...Why a Q3 $4.22 million loss?Hey H....like me or don't....doesn't matter a damn. The "infestation" post is absolute TRUTH. Scary part is some readers think it is just "bash". Sheet...do your Due Diligence! OPEN your EYES People! EVE gave "no comments", no guidance on an UNEXPECTED $4.22 million loss. WTF?
Bob Hungmunculus wrote: I enjoy all the participants on this board for the most part. I am perpetually learning about the market, people and sometimes even EVE. Best is people post news sometimes before it pops up on the radar. Given that EVE is almost entirely owned by retail, I really do think the motives matter, as retail is amateur hour, myself included. I'll agree Bobby has seemingly accurate posts can't pinpoint the suttle oversights I feel that have been made nor do I wish to go through the history of posts to sort it out. I question the validity of everyone on this board of course but it's good to see differing views. He's got a recent fact that I truly enjoy, "Infestations". That's sarcasm as thats a new low for this basher. And make no doubt about it, paid or not, Bobby is a basher and yes I question his motives. I don't really care if he has numerous aliases either. It sure is hard reading through the filth for the occassional pertinent item. Sorry though just venting, nothing of value in regards to EVE.
HandyAfterall wrote: Bobby is annoying, sure. But he's not the reason the sp is where it is. He's not the reason the financials are disastrous. So far, he's the one making the most fact-based arguments. Almost everyone else is countering his reasoned (albeit in a frustrating way) points, by questioning his motives, suggesting he's got multiple aliases, etc. All of that is irrelevant.
even if Bobby was actually every poster on this board, and was getting compensated to bash...none of that changes any of the facts, or the realities. And none of it would be the reason the company and share price are in the situation they're in.
I'm sitting on shares i started buying at 40 cents, and have bought most of the way down to where we are. I find the frequency of Bobby's posts annoying...but that doesn't take away from the validity of the points he's making.
In short, if you're going to argue with the guy, at least bring facts and analysis to the fight. Attacking his motives, identity, etc is just embarrassing, and makes it seem like eve's defenders don't know how business works.