Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BZAM Ltd BZAMF

BZAM Ltd. is a Canadian cannabis producer with a focus on branded consumer goods. Its portfolio includes core brands, such as BZAM, TGOD, ness, Highly Dutch Organic, TABLE TOP, as well as partner brands Jeeter, Cookies, Sherbinskis, Dunn Cannabis, FRESH and Wyld. It operates facilities in British Columbia (BC), Alberta (AB), Ontario and Quebec, as well as retail stores in Regina, Saskatchewan. The Company’s subsidiaries, The Green Organic Dutchman Ltd. (TGOD), BZAM Management Inc., Folium Life Science Inc. and BZAM Cannabis Corp., are licensed producers and hold licenses to produce cannabis plants, cannabis plant seeds, dried cannabis, fresh cannabis, cannabis oils, cannabis topicals, cannabis extracts and edible cannabis and sell such cannabis products within Canada to provincially authorized retailers or distributors and federally licensed entities. Its product portfolio includes categories, such as Infused, Multi-packs, Edibles, Organic, and Craft.


GREY:BZAMF - Post by User

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Post by flush777on Nov 29, 2020 1:28pm
1007 Views
Post# 31996957

Very disappointed in the BoD for TGOD since they

Very disappointed in the BoD for TGOD since theydont do the best for their shareholders.

I am surprised again by another shelf prospectus for funding by TGOD. This means to me another dilution for shareholders who supported the company and the deals go to new shareholders.

So many times, we have heard that we are fully funded and this has not simply been the case. Funding occurred but not at prices when the stock was high but when the stock price was low.

Each issue of shares was further diluted by lower than market prices for the new shares and again lower prices for the attached warrants continuing the slope downward ... yup, existing unexpired warrants at $1.00 down to less than 25 cents exercise price for the newer warrants, I believe and yes, I am a warrant holder and an initial shareholder from the 50 cent public round.

It is a better decision to simply reduce the price of the existing warrants to below market than to issue new shares below market together with discounted warrants as a sweetner to further dilute the interests of shareholders.

I own shares in an unrelated company and they keep on extending the dates for the warrants when they get close to expiry. They save a done of money on legal, accounting and finance fees and further do not dilute the existing shareholders.

This would be a wise course of action, IMHO, but will anyone listen?? If history is a guide then the answer is emphatically NO!!

Flush777

PS - I wonder how Rob Anderson feels, the way the company has strayed ...
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>