RE:RE:Broke ST support Blackspade799-Thanks for note but I would like to clarify some details which represent more positive views for sp.
The Jury award of $ 108.98 is not the final judgment of Judge Dana as Judge agreed to issue his final judgment based upon the court decision referred back to him by Federal Cuircuit Court. Judge Dana has in effect passed decision to Federal Curcuit court.. Before Joint Motion to Stay Judge Dana referred to post iphone7 sales royalty by Apple.
In Motion of Stay it stays quite specifically that Apple would report on a interim basis to Wi-Lan the results of post Ip 7 revenue. The Joint Motion to Stay states that results of of the Federal Circuit Court would be referred back to the court with the results of Federal Circuit Court for judge Dana to make his FINAL JUDGEMENT which I am sure will include Apple post 7 figures which agreed to be supplied in Motion of Stay. Post 7 results included in 108 would I estimate Final Judgement of Dana would be in amount of $ 150 US.
In addition we could possibly get greater award than 108 plus post 7 results due to cross-appeal.
A cross-appeal occurs only if the appelle requests that a higher court review some aspect of the lower court's decision and not simply uphold the lower court decision. The question of what we disagree which is not something aI going to speculate on. Apple has made its initial court brief on Nov 20 and we have 45 days to respond. That means we will have cross-appeal details by Jan 4 20201/ 33 days from now.
Details of Joint Motion of Stay was posted but I currently cannot find . Could somebody post Joint Motion of STaY toread re above which could further claify above.