RE:RE:RE:RE:Bob M...Crystallex a con job?
BobMoriarty wrote: TXRogers has made the most contribution to this site of anyone I know. His understanding of the nuances ot the company and the deal is second to none. He was attacked by a person I know to be a con man. I him caught pumping and dumping Crystallex in March of 2009 where as Mark Turner he was touting the company on the same day as IKN he was trashing it. That's illegal.
He demands evidence even though he has never provided even a shred of evidence that I am a jue-hater because he can't and demanded I provide evidence he is a con man.
So if you go to Google and connect Crystallex and Mark Turner you can see all the puff pieces he wrote about a company that was the biggest scam in the last 30 years. BRE-X was far larger in financial terms but BRE-X just got carried away with doing something others were doing some variation of and the market in general was looking for a scam to get behind. I don't know that BRE-X was a scam from the gitgo and yes it cost investors billions of dollars but it was an irrational "discovery" even at the time and people should have known better.
So Mark Turner demands TXRogers produce evidence but Turner provides no evidence of almost everthing he has ever written about. So if you want to know who is a con, you can find the evidence on Google.
Every single mining guy in South America and most outside investors understood that Crystallex was a scam from the gitgo. But Mark Turner promoted it. I know others who did and every single one of them got something out of it. So the guy who wants to trash the most valuable poster on this site about Novo was promoting a total con. He threated to sue me in March of 2009 if I outed him but he's all hat and no cattle. Hell will freeze over before he sues anyone. It would open him up to a deposition and I would pay my twin brother a lot of money to depose Mark Turner. I'd love to put that psycho out to pasture.
I appreciate the compliment, BM. But as we all know, insights do not guarantee a fortune will be made. They only shine light onto "paths of probability".
These twists and turns over the last few years have not shaken my belief in the potential of the Novo investment. Only the timelines. That's because the people running the company have been forging ahead undeterred. It is them in which I have ultimately invested .
Novo's commitment to becoming a producer, their continued asset acquisitions, and their recent declarations that they are on track for Q1 2021 all continues to reinforce that the investment thesis is valid.
That is it.
Tx