RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Well...Look, this is speculation, but IMO, I think they timed the CEO change because they know Q4 is decent, at least part of them, (ie white label growth) and they want to turn the page with new high management on the getgo for what would be a break out year in 2021. I doubt they would sack Pat to have the new CEO start off with bad news in Q4, it wouldn't make sense to have new CEO put on the chopping block right off the bat. If bad news were coming in Q4 they'd let Pat eat dirt and sack him afterwards, giving the first good news to new CEO.
I also doubt they'd be able to recruit high level CEO with a bad news start.
Whatever this opinion is worth, I've been wrong before.