Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cascadia Minerals Ltd V.CAM

Alternate Symbol(s):  CAMNF

Cascadia is a Canadian junior mining company focused on exploring for copper and gold in the Yukon and British Columbia . Cascadia's flagship Catch Property in the Yukon hosts a brand-new copper-gold porphyry discovery where inaugural drill results returned broad intervals of mineralization, including 116.60 m of 0.31% copper with 0.30 g/t gold. Catch exhibits extensive high-grade copper and gold mineralization across a 5 km long trend, with rock samples returning peak values of 3.88% copper and 30.00 g/t gold.


TSXV:CAM - Post by User

Post by barringtondolbyon Dec 14, 2020 11:52pm
268 Views
Post# 32106592

More Musings

More MusingsOne of my original concerns was if Atac delayed doing any further investments in Rackla were they liable to lose their permit to operate there.
I noticed in the Reason for Decision Document, section, Consideration of Environmental and Socio-Economic Effects, in the last paragraph,it states that "only three full exploration seasons remain on the current ming land use approval, (expiry date August 13, 2024).
Does Atac loose it rights to Rackla in 2024? I would be surprised if this is so, but the way it is written raises questions.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>