RE:RE:NR & TweetBrings up an interesting point... So the 'event's that those 2 devices 'protect' against are severe/catastrophic, immediate and can have devestating (e.g. immediately fatal) results. However, they are relatively infrequent.
Kind of an inversion with this tech...Though obviously severe outcomes are possible (and are what have prompted this innovation), these events (of 'detection') are understandably expected to be far far more frequent, so in a way it's arguably more 'useful' as a day-to-day risk management tool for a business. This is to say, that the 'value' case for adoption is arguably pretty darn strong... Exciting times to be an investor in this technology and in the KNR team.