RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:no 3dIP results = Bad news? This will be my last comment on the topic because I don't think anything wrong was done - I think the author just wanted to bring some temperance to the OCO name.
Yes, the Caesar's report had an NPV on the property. In mining, companies trade/transact for anywhere between 0% - 100% of NPV based on a whole sleuth of factors including (I) jurisdiction,(II) exploration potential, etc. Usually 25% - 50% is used.
So he never opined on the last step of how much OCO's market cap/share price should be.
His previous reports all focused on the property and not the stock. It is just goofy to then come out and say take profits because the math shows you can pull out your cost basis by by only liquidating 25% of your stake.
If I can use an analogy, it's like he was a consultant hired to put together a report on "competitive dynamics" and then issues an update on "best HR practices"