RE:RE:NorthProspector to Santa's Ignore listsome of the biggest evidence for PYR is the fact that Peter Pascali, PYR's president and ceo, owns over 50% of the outstanding shares. peter has invested a lot of his own money into PYR, and has never sold one share. also, PYR has been around for decades and has countless patents awarded and granted for their technology...
i look at insider holdings and the fact that peter owns so much of the company, and has never sold any shares, speaks volumes about where this company is headed.
look at the work PYR has done with the US navy, additive manufacturing, PUREVAP. even the torch contract win with RISE is epic... PYR beat out everybody for this... even a local "hometown" company... PyroGenesis is going places, peter and company have done great work and have built a solid foundation for success.
also, not sure why you keep posting if you don't own any shares here...
NorthProspector wrote: Only have this account and as I said, not a shorter, just out of this hugely overvalued but declining in share price stock.
so make up whatever stories you must to try and make yourself feel good, read others predictions, but I will await EVIDENCE instead.
A wiser person may reflect on the points I mentioned, and re-evaluate their methods of valuation, and the difference between intelligent discourse re valuation vs. making up false accusations, wild predictions, etc. The latter makes one look either like a pumper, or ....
Check out the price gains in Bitcoin vs the loss in value in PYR over the past little while, and then make up excuses that someone's wallet may have been stolen. Unless everyone investing in Bitcoin have had their wallets stolen (which shows your lack of knowledge in investing in Bitcoin), then it's price would have collapsed, not gone up. Some of the best younger minds of this generation, worldwide, are working in the crypto field, maybe start looking at things with a bit more of an open mind.
didn't someone on here before try and compare the HPQ scenario to Dynacert? Now that made me chuckle back then, and raise just one more red flag ... as I say, go back to SEDAR around 2012 and then start working forward on that company as well, along with their management. That's called due dillegence. Bet you haven't done that. But go ahead, insult me instead, lol.
some things just don't pass the smell test, as I learnt in my commercial banking and venture capital past. Hope I'm wrong on this company, but will await PROOF and evidence before considering getting back in, and suggest others might be wise to do the same, just as APPLE's stock price, after introducing the game-changing iPhone, didn't realize its gains right away.
My humble opinion is that this stock is highly overvalued currently, until sales and revenues increase substantially to validate its current market value, and the stock will continue to drift downwards until that happens. It's not on the VSE anymore, as you move up to the TSE, and even Nasdaq, you get better scrutiny by smarter people.
Your mileage may vary. To each their own. But seriously, stick to facts, not personal insults or made up accusations, which otherwise show your true colours.
Revenues realized, not projected, are the proof of the pudding. This company has not reached that stage, to warrant the valuation, plain and simple. Think about it.
goodnight all.